20% off first hosting order with code APEX20 00:00:00 See deals
NVMe · PHP-FPM · WordPress · Independent Tests · June 2026

Real Performance.
Real Numbers.

We don't just claim to be fast — we show you the data. Independent benchmarks comparing Hoststack against Hostinger and MilesWeb on disk I/O, PHP response time and WordPress load speed.

6.3x

Faster disk I/O

2.2x

Faster PHP response

1.9x

Faster WP page load

2.1x

More WP req/sec

Test Methodology

Transparent and reproducible. Here's exactly how we ran these benchmarks.

  • Tests were run from an independent VPS located in Mumbai (not owned by any provider being tested).
  • Same WordPress 6.5 installation used for all providers — same theme (Astra), same plugins (WooCommerce, Yoast).
  • No CDN enabled on any provider. All tests hit origin servers directly.
  • Cold cache testing — object cache and page cache cleared before each run.
  • Entry-level shared hosting plans compared (₹99-149/mo range). Not VPS.
  • WordPress wrk benchmark: 10 concurrent connections, 30-second run, measured transactions/second.
  • PHP-FPM response: median of 50 requests to a PHP info page with no database query.
  • Disk I/O: fio sequential read test, queue depth 32, 1GB file size.
  • Tests conducted June 2026. Results may vary. This is not a sponsored comparison.

Benchmark Results

1 Disk I/O — Sequential Read (MB/s)

Hoststack

NVMe SSD

3,400 MB/s

WINNER

Hostinger

SATA SSD

540 MB/s

MilesWeb

SATA SSD

430 MB/s

2 PHP-FPM Response Time — Median (ms) Lower is better

Hoststack

LiteSpeed + PHP 8.3

28ms

FASTEST

Hostinger

Apache/nginx

61ms

MilesWeb

Apache

74ms

3 WordPress Page Load — Average 10 Runs (ms) Lower is better

Hoststack

No cache, cold

380ms

FASTEST

Hostinger

No cache, cold

720ms

MilesWeb

No cache, cold

810ms

4 WordPress Transactions/sec (wrk benchmark) Higher is better

Hoststack

10 concurrent, 30s

142 req/s

BEST

Hostinger

10 concurrent, 30s

67 req/s

MilesWeb

10 concurrent, 30s

58 req/s

Note: Benchmarks are approximate and may vary based on server load, ISP, and time of day. Entry-level shared hosting plans were compared. Tested June 2026. Results shown are representative averages. Hosting providers change hardware and configurations over time — results may differ on re-test.

Why NVMe Makes Such a Big Difference

3,400+ MB/s

NVMe sequential read speeds vs ~540 MB/s on SATA SSD — the disk bottleneck disappears entirely.

Sub-ms Latency

NVMe access latency is 0.02–0.1ms. SATA SSD is 0.5ms+. For WordPress with many DB reads, this compounds.

Shared Hosting Benefit

On shared hosting, NVMe means your site doesn't slow down when neighbours have high I/O — less contention.

Try Hoststack Free for 7 Days

Put our benchmarks to the test yourself. 7-day money-back guarantee, no questions asked.

WhatsApp Discord